Say "I don't trust it" about AI
Percent of U.S. adults who say "I don't trust it" about AI, by generation, 2023 (in percent)
Key finding
Highest: Boomers (45%). Lowest: Gen Z (18%).
- Boomers: 45%
- Gen X: 25%
- Millennials: 21%
Source: Barna Group, Hesitant & Hopeful: How Different Generations View Artificial Intelligence · Online survey of 1,500 U.S. adults, July 28 to August 7, 2023; margin of error +/- 2.1 percent. Article published 2024-01-24.
See all 4 categories, the full chart and more
Free account: full chart, CSV and PNG downloads, ready-to-paste citation, branded share image, and a discussion question for your team.
Questions about this statistic
What does this statistic show?
Highest: Boomers (45%). Lowest: Gen Z (18%). Boomers: 45%. Gen X: 25%. Millennials: 21%.
Who published this data?
Barna Group, 2023. Source: Barna Group, Hesitant & Hopeful: How Different Generations View Artificial Intelligence (https://www.barna.com/research/generations-ai/).
Where can I get the full data and a citation?
Create a free Leader Insights account to open the full chart, download CSV or PNG, copy a citation and save the statistic to your own library.
More Digital & AI statistics
- Americans who agree AI can assist them in understanding the Bible American Bible Society, 2026
- Christians who feel hopeful about AI's potential for good Barna Group, 2026
- Christians who see value in their church offering a digital resource hub Barna Group, 2026
- Approval of AI-generated creative works Barna Group, 2024
- Digital tools Christians say churches could benefit from Barna Group, 2024
- Monthly use of Christian media Barna Group, 2024
About this data
Leader Insights collects statistics about U.S. churches from published research by organizations such as Lifeway Research, Barna Group, Springtide, the American Bible Society and PRRI. Every number is checked against the wording of the original source before it is published, and each statistic links back to the study it came from. Figures are reproduced from the publishers named above; see the source for full methodology.