Pastors' view of the current economy's impact on their church
Percent of U.S. Protestant pastors, 2020 (in percent)
Key finding
Highest: Negative impact (48%). Lowest: Positive impact (15%).
- Negative impact: 48%
- No impact: 35%
- Positive impact: 15%
Source: Lifeway Research, Half of Pastors See Negative Economic Impact for Church · Lifeway Research mixed mode survey of 1,007 Protestant pastors; sampling error plus or minus 3.4%. Article published 2020-11-10.
Get the chart, CSV, PNG and citation
Free account: full chart, CSV and PNG downloads, ready-to-paste citation, branded share image, and a discussion question for your team.
Questions about this statistic
What does this statistic show?
Highest: Negative impact (48%). Lowest: Positive impact (15%). Negative impact: 48%. No impact: 35%. Positive impact: 15%.
Who published this data?
Lifeway Research, 2020. Source: Lifeway Research, Half of Pastors See Negative Economic Impact for Church (https://research.lifeway.com/2020/11/10/half-of-pastors-see-negative-economic-impact-for-church/).
Where can I get the full data and a citation?
Create a free Leader Insights account to open the full chart, download CSV or PNG, copy a citation and save the statistic to your own library.
More Giving statistics
- Americans who donate to charity or church, by Bible engagement American Bible Society, 2025
- Church giving compared with last year Lifeway Research, 2025
- Congregations' income compared with expenses Lifeway Research, 2025
- 2021 offerings compared with the previous year Lifeway Research, 2021
- Adults who have given financially to charitable organizations, by generation Barna Group, 2021
- Americans who prefer digital forms of giving Barna Group, 2021
About this data
Leader Insights collects statistics about U.S. churches from published research by organizations such as Lifeway Research, Barna Group, Springtide, the American Bible Society and PRRI. Every number is checked against the wording of the original source before it is published, and each statistic links back to the study it came from. Figures are reproduced from the publishers named above; see the source for full methodology.